Choosing the right 22.5-inch RV tires is critical for safety, fuel economy, and longevity on long hauls. We researched manufacturer specifications, industry load and speed ratings, and aggregated owner feedback from thousands of miles of real-world use. This guide compares seven top models across key metrics to help you make an informed decision.
Our evaluation focuses on load capacity, tread life, wet and dry traction, and overall value. We highlight strengths and weaknesses for each tire, so you can match the right tire to your RV type and driving habits.
| Photo | Product | Score | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|
|
🚗
|
Michelin XRV Best Overall Load Range G / 14-ply rating, max load 4,805 lbs at 110 psi |
9.2 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Goodyear G670 RV Runner Up Load Range H / 16-ply rating, max load 5,000 lbs at 120 psi |
8.9 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Continental HSR2 Best Value Load Range G / 14-ply rating, max load 4,805 lbs at 110 psi |
8.6 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Firestone FS561 Durable Choice Load Range G / 14-ply rating, max load 4,805 lbs at 110 psi |
8.3 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Bridgestone R250 Ecopia Eco-Friendly Load Range G / 14-ply rating, max load 4,805 lbs at 110 psi |
8.1 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Hankook AH12 Solid Performer Load Range G / 14-ply rating, max load 4,805 lbs at 110 psi |
7.8 | 🛒 Check Price |
|
🚗
|
Sumitomo ST719 Budget Pick Load Range G / 14-ply rating, max load 4,805 lbs at 110 psi |
7.3 | 🛒 Check Price |
1. Michelin XRV: Best Overall
The Michelin XRV consistently earns high marks from RV owners for its durability and ride quality. In our research, this tire delivers exceptional tread life, often exceeding 60,000 miles in motorhome applications. The silica-enhanced tread compound provides confident grip in both wet and dry conditions, and the reinforced casing resists punctures and impacts. Owner feedback highlights minimal road noise and stable handling even when fully loaded.
However, the Michelin XRV comes at a significant premium over many competitors. For RVers who put on moderate miles or store their vehicle for long periods, the investment may not pay off. Consider this tire if you log high annual mileage and want maximum longevity and safety. Those on a tighter budget may find better value elsewhere.
- Excellent tread life with even wear patterns reported by many owners
- Superior wet and dry traction thanks to advanced silica compound
- Reinforced sidewalls resist cuts and abrasions on rough roads
Pros: Long-lasting tread life; Excellent stability at highway speeds
Cons: Premium price point may not suit budget-conscious buyers
2. Goodyear G670 RV: Runner Up
The Goodyear G670 RV is a popular choice for large Class A motorhomes and heavy fifth wheels. Our evaluation of spec sheets and owner reviews shows that this tire handles heavy loads with confidence, thanks to its 16-ply rating and robust construction. The tread design offers decent traction on unpaved campsite roads, and the tire maintains stability at highway speeds. Many owners report satisfactory tread life when proper inflation is maintained.
On the downside, some users have experienced uneven wear patterns, especially on steer axles, requiring diligent rotation schedules. The ride can be slightly firmer than some competitors due to the stiff sidewalls. This tire is best for those who prioritize load capacity and need a reliable all-around performer. Lighter RVs may find the ride harsh, and the premium price may not be justified for occasional use.
- High load capacity suitable for heavy motorhomes and toy haulers
- Deep tread pattern provides good traction on gravel and light off-road
- Stable sidewall construction reduces sway in crosswinds
Pros: Very high load rating; Good traction on loose surfaces
Cons: Some owners report uneven wear if not rotated regularly
3. Continental HSR2: Best Value
The Continental HSR2 strikes a strong balance between cost and capability. Based on manufacturer data and owner feedback, this tire offers reliable performance for most RV applications at a more accessible price point. The tread design includes wide grooves and sipes that evacuate water effectively, reducing hydroplaning risk. Many users note improved fuel economy compared to older tires, a welcome benefit for long trips.
However, some owners report that tread wear accelerates under heavy loads or in hot climates, so it may not last as long as premium options like the Michelin XRV. The ride quality is generally good but can transmit more road vibration on rough surfaces. This tire is ideal for RVers who want solid performance without the top-tier price. If you plan to keep the RV for many years or drive extensively, consider investing in a longer-lasting model.
- Competitive pricing without sacrificing essential performance
- Enhanced tread compound for improved fuel efficiency
- Good wet traction with multiple sipes and grooves
Pros: Excellent value for the price; Good fuel economy due to low rolling resistance
Cons: Tread life may be shorter than premium models in heavy use
4. Firestone FS561: Durable Choice
The Firestone FS561 is built for longevity, with a robust casing that many commercial fleets use for retreading. In our research, this tire excels in durability, with owners reporting few punctures or sidewall issues even on rough terrain. The stone ejector ribs help prevent stones from lodging in the tread, a common cause of damage. The tire feels stable when towing heavy loads, and the tread wears evenly under proper maintenance.
However, wet traction is not class-leading; the tread compound prioritizes wear resistance over grip. Some owners note reduced confidence in heavy rain compared to premium tires. The ride can also be slightly stiff. This tire is best for RVers who drive primarily on dry highways and want maximum durability for the long haul. If you frequently encounter wet roads or need superior traction, you may prefer a different model.
- Rugged casing designed for long service life and retreading
- Stone ejectors in tread grooves protect against stone drilling
- Wide shoulder blocks enhance stability under load
Pros: Excellent durability and retreadability; Resistant to stone retention
Cons: Traction on wet roads is merely average
5. Bridgestone R250 Ecopia: Eco-Friendly
The Bridgestone R250 Ecopia is engineered for fuel savings, making it an attractive option for eco-conscious RVers or those who cover many miles. Manufacturer data shows a reduction in rolling resistance compared to standard tires, which can translate to noticeable fuel savings over a season. Owner reviews often mention a quiet, comfortable ride and decent handling. The tire is lighter than some rivals, which can improve ride quality and reduce wear on suspension components.
However, the trade-off for low rolling resistance is often reduced tread life, especially when the tire is heavily loaded. Some owners report faster wear on the drive axle of motorhomes. Also, wet traction is adequate but not exceptional. This tire is best for those who prioritize fuel economy and drive moderate distances on well-maintained roads. If you carry maximum loads or venture off pavement, consider a more rugged option.
- Low rolling resistance compound improves fuel economy
- Lightweight construction reduces unsprung mass
- Tread pattern designed for even wear and low noise
Pros: Better fuel efficiency than many competitors; Quiet ride on highways
Cons: Tread life may be shorter under heavy loads
6. Hankook AH12: Solid Performer
The Hankook AH12 is a budget-friendly tire that offers respectable performance for lighter RV applications. In our research, it provides good wet traction thanks to its aggressive siping and wide grooves, which help reduce hydroplaning. Owners often praise the quiet ride and smooth handling on highways. The tire mounts easily and balances well, reducing vibration.
However, the AH12 may not hold up as well under constant heavy loads or in hot climates. Some users report faster tread wear and occasional sidewall cracking after a few years. The load capacity is adequate for most mid-size motorhomes, but full-timers or those with heavy rigs should look at higher-ply options. This tire is a solid choice for occasional use or lighter RVs. If you push your RV to its maximum weight rating regularly, invest in a more robust tire.
- Four wide grooves for effective water evacuation
- Zigzag sipes enhance traction on wet roads
- Reinforced bead area for stable mounting
Pros: Good wet traction for the price; Smooth and quiet ride
Cons: Not as durable as premium brands under heavy use
7. Sumitomo ST719: Budget Pick
The Sumitomo ST719 is the most budget-oriented option in our comparison. It meets basic load and speed requirements for many RV applications at a significantly lower cost than competitors. Some owners find it acceptable for short trips or occasional use, and the tire provides stable straight-line handling when new. The deep tread offers decent initial grip on dry roads.
However, the ST719 has notable drawbacks. Owner feedback indicates that tread wear accelerates quickly, especially on drive axles, and some users have experienced uneven wear patterns. Wet traction is below average, with a higher risk of hydroplaning in heavy rain. The ride quality is also firmer than more expensive tires. This tire is best suited for budget-conscious RVers who drive infrequently and in dry conditions. For safety and longevity, we recommend spending more on a higher-rated model.
- Lowest price point among major brands in this category
- Deep tread depth for initial traction
- Ribbed tread design promotes straight-line stability
Pros: Very affordable; Adequate for low-mileage use
Cons: Tread life is below average; some owners report rapid wear; Wet traction can be inadequate in heavy rain
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between load range G and H in 22.5 RV tires?
Load range indicates the tire’s ply rating and maximum load capacity. Load range G typically has a 14-ply rating and a maximum load of around 4,805 lbs at 110 psi. Load range H has a 16-ply rating and can carry up to 5,000 lbs at 120 psi. The higher the load range, the more weight the tire can support, but it also results in a stiffer ride. Choose based on your RV’s actual loaded weight per axle.
How often should I replace 22.5 RV tires?
Most manufacturers recommend replacing RV tires every 6 to 10 years, regardless of tread depth, due to rubber aging. For 22.5 tires, check the sidewall for the DOT date code. Even if tread remains, sidewall cracking or ozone damage can compromise safety. Also replace when tread depth reaches 4/32 inch on steer tires or 2/32 inch on drive tires.
Can I mix different brands of 22.5 tires on my RV?
It is not recommended to mix tire brands or models on the same axle, as differences in tread design, compound, and diameter can cause uneven wear and handling issues. For safety, always pair identical tires on each axle. You can mix brands between steer and drive axles, but it is best to keep them matched for consistent performance.
What tire pressure should I run in my 22.5 RV tires?
The correct pressure depends on your RV’s actual weight per axle. Always follow the tire manufacturer’s load inflation tables, not the sidewall max pressure. Weigh your RV loaded for travel and inflate to the pressure that supports that weight. Underinflation causes heat buildup and premature failure; overinflation reduces traction and ride comfort.
Are 22.5 RV tires suitable for winter driving?
Most 22.5 RV tires are all-season highway tires not designed for snow or ice. In cold conditions, rubber compounds stiffen, reducing traction. For winter travel, consider tires with the Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol, such as some all-terrain models, or use tire chains where legal. Always reduce speed and increase following distance in snow or ice.
Our Verdict
After comparing specifications and owner feedback, the Michelin XRV earns our top recommendation for its exceptional tread life, stability, and safety. It is the best choice for full-time RVers and those who prioritize longevity. For a more budget-friendly option that still delivers reliable performance, the Continental HSR2 offers excellent value without major compromises.
